Essential services must be accessible, even offline

The open letter

Thursday 7 March 2024

All the versions of this letter:

To the European Commission, the Council of the European Union, and the European Parliament.

Public administration, banks and energy suppliers, as well as employers, health providers… have moved online, and counters, mail services and phone lines are disappearing.

Yet, more than 40% of Europe’s population still lacks basic digital skills, preventing them from accessing certain essential services.

There is an urgent need to guarantee off-line access to all essential services.

An open letter supported by:

and:

  • Périne Brotcorne, sociologist and researcher, UCLouvain, Belgium.
  • Élise Degrave, jurist and professor at the University of Namur, Belgium.
  • Fabien Granjon, sociologist and professor, Paris 8 University Vincennes-Saint-Denis, France.
  • Pierre Mazet, independent social scientist, France.
  • Carlos San Juan, retired doctor, European Citizen 2022, Spain.
  • Jan A.G.M. van Dijk, professor of communication science, University of Twente, the Netherlands.

Show the rest of the open letter…

Digital technology has become essential

The digitisation of society is accelerating and now affects most of our daily life. Public administration, banks and energy suppliers, as well as employers and health providers have moved online. At the same time, offline alternative channels such as counters, mail services and phone lines are disappearing.

2 out of 5 Europeans
are digitally vulnerable

This digitisation process is taking place at a time when more than 40% of Europe’s population still lacks basic digital skills. [1]

Older people, those with poor literacy, people with disability, but also women and migrants with precarious status are amongst the most digitally vulnerable groups. [2] In some cases, digital inequalities reinforce existing social difficulties. Instead of improving access, digitisation therefore accelerates a downward spiral and leads to situations such as the non-take up of social rights, financial exclusion, loss of autonomy or energy supplies being cut off.

The paradox of the European strategy

Today, there is a paradox as we witness a European strategy that strongly encourages further digitisation of all kinds of services whilst a digital gap persists digitisation, with over 40% of European citizens unable to use the digital tools and technologies required to access online services.

This situation risks undermining a number of shared EU values regarding essential services [3] such as accessibility, universal access and equal treatment. Many of these shared values were embodied in 2017 through the common adoption of the European Pillar of Social Rights, whose principle 20 enshrined the right to access essential services: Everyone has the right to access essential services of good quality, including water, sanitation, energy, transport, financial services and digital communications. Support for access to such services shall be available for those in need. [4]

Despite this paradox, the EU Digital Decade strategy has not changed its digitisation target: 100% of public services, including health care, should move online by 2030. [5]

Training and the automation of rights: problematic solutions

We recognize the many efforts taken by the EU and its members states to trigger digital inclusion and widen assistance for vulnerable people to access digital services. These efforts, however, are only part of the solution to the issue of digital inequality.

Regardless of how much money is invested in training services, learning takes time – particularly for the 20% of Europeans with low overall literacy levels. [6] Moreover, some digital technologies and tools will remain out of reach for people with disabilities who often already face barriers with regard to general education.

Automated data processing, made available through the growing development and use of digital platforms, may create further issues for individuals and families facing social exclusion. Data analysis algorithms have been heralded as a way for citizens to access healthcare and social services, yet this technology might reinforce discrimination instead of tackling it. Recent examples in the Netherlands [7] and France [8] show that thousands of families have been wrongly suspected or even accused of social fraud by algorithms that reinforce racial, class or gender stereotypes, in some cases depriving households of the income they need to survive.

A moratorium to restore access to essential services, debate and legislate

We are aware that digitisation is a global trend that will continue, but we call upon EU leaders to act to slow down unrestricted digitalisation of essential services and avoid the growth of digital inequalities.

We are therefore asking for a moratorium that would freeze the development of digitisation of essential services on a European scale.

A moratorium is necessary in order to restore accessibility to all essential services, and would require the right to multichannel access (the click-call-connect principle) to be protected in European law. Offline channels such as counters and phone-based helplines should be provided to cover citizens’ needs and should not involve any additional costs.

In 2023, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, representing the voice of 700 million Europeans, adopted a resolution on the digital divide recommending that Member States ‘move from fully paperless to fully accessible public services, including by maintaining non-digital access to public services wherever necessary to ensure equal access to public services, their continuity and their adaptation to users. [9] A moratorium could provide the time needed by Member States to implement the Council of Europe’s recommendation.

A moratorium would also give our societies time to organise a democratic debate on the kind of digital technology we wish to have. Such a discussion is urgently needed in order to build a digital world that is based on the needs and wishes of all our citizens, including those who are often underrepresented.

And finally, a moratorium could give us the necessary time to draw up and enact laws that protect the general interest and provide a support framework for the political project we have chosen.

I sign the open letter

Are you involved in this issue as a scientist (researcher, expert, etc.) or as an organisation?

Initially, the signature will be open only to scientists and organisations.
But you also can support our action as a citizen.

Identifiers

To send you the verification e-mail. Will not be displayed in the signatures.

The personal data provided to us via the signature form is used to manage your signature or for statistical purposes. Apart from the e-mail address, the information provided will be displayed in the list of signatories. The e-mail verifying your signature on the open letter is sent via the MailJet service, on which we have deactivated the tracking of e-mail opening and followed links. The information provided will not be passed on or sold to any other third party. The law on the protection of privacy gives you the right to access and rectify your data, as well as the right to object to the use of your data. Contact: Lire et Écrire Communauté française – rue des Vétérinaires 42A bte 4 – 1070 Anderlecht – lire-et-ecrire@lire-et-ecrire.be


Signatures

549 Signatures
Date Name or organisation Country Organisation / Website
4 December 2024 Smes asbl Belgique www.smes.be
4 December 2024 Centre Louise Michel Belgique
4 December 2024 Planning Familial La Famille Heureuse Verviers Belgique
4 December 2024 Bürgerrechtsgruppe dieDatenschützer Rhein Main Bundesrepublik Deutschland https://ddrm.de/
3 December 2024 Service Social de Cureghem asbl Belgique
3 December 2024 Alain EMPAIN Belgique Université de Liège, Dr
3 December 2024 Pigment vzw Belgium www.pigmentvzw.be
3 December 2024 vzw-Buurthuis/Maison de quartier Bonnevie-asbl Belgique www.bonnevie40.be
3 December 2024 Centre Séverine,planning familial laïque de Bruxelles-Ouest Belgique www.planning-severine.org
3 December 2024 Yahyâ Hachem Samii Belgique Criminologue
3 December 2024 kenniscentrumwwz België www.kenniscentrumwwz.be
3 December 2024 dushaj drita avocate belgique avocate
3 December 2024 Centre de planning familial de Watermael-Boitsfort Belgique https://planningfamilialdeboitsfort.be/
3 December 2024 Planning familial Ourthe Ambleve Belgique
3 December 2024 Jacques VEDRIN Belgique médecin généraliste
3 December 2024 Centre de planning familial Aimer Jeunes Belgique
3 December 2024 Planning Familial Collectif contraception santé des femmes Belgique https://collectifcontraception.be/
3 December 2024 Robert Goedertier Belgique retraité de Institut Scientifique de Santé Publique
3 December 2024 Planning familial "Aimer à Louvain-La-Neuve Belgique
3 December 2024 asbl trapèze Belgique

[1European Commission, 2022. Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2022. Human Capital, p. 7.

[2For more statistics regarding digitally vulnerable groups at European level, see DESI report 2023: DESI 2023 dashboard for the Digital Decade.

[3Services are considered “essential” when their low or non-use is likely to generate discrimination in terms of access to social rights (e-administration and e-banking), healthcare (e-health), and commercial opportunities linked to the consumption of goods and services (e-commerce). See: Access to essential services - Towards a European Pillar of Social Rights.

[4European Commission. Access to essential services.

[6Council of the European Union, 2016. Recommandation on Upskilling Pathways: New Opportunities for Adults, Brussels (2016/C 484/01).

[8France Culture, 12 February 2024. Justice sociale : quand les algorithmes de la CAF discriminent les plus précaires, Le Biais d’Esther Duflo.

[9Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, 2023. Resolution 2510: Closing the digital divide: promoting equal access to digital technologies.